Women Priests

• Hey guys. Today I want to talk about a sort of controversial topic, women priests. In Kentucky there is a woman who was ordained a priest. She believes to be under the authority of the church, but she is not. The church teaches that only men can be priests and no one else. Former Pope Benidict reaffirmed the statement and threatened other priest’s orders and excommunication if they were to ordain a woman priest. This woman, Smead, said that she is not scared of excommunication and is going to preahc regadless of what the church says. I think that this is wrong, I’m one for equaltiy for all but if the church says it is against its teachings then I say it is wrong as well. I leave this one up for discussion. If you want to read the article for yourself here is the link: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/28/us-usa-religion-womenpriests-idUSBRE93Q0EE20130428.

    

Reflection on News Article

Kentucky Women Ordained Priest Outside Roman Catholic Church 

I really don't know how to address this topic without being sexist or discriminate about women's rights. A week ago, in theology, we were studying the marks of the Church. One of the most arguably important marks, One, would vigorously attack this problem.

In order to be fully be in communion with Christ and his Church, we must be one in faith, one in praise, and one in leadership. In the article, it states "The former pope, Benedict XVI, reaffirmed the Catholic Church's ban on women priests and warned that he would not tolerate disobedience by clerics on fundamental teachings". This draws a huge line across the playing field. I do not believe Pope Benedict XVI was under the influence of any one but God himself, when reaffirming this ruling. This already cripples the mark of the Church, One, because Smead is no longer in collaboration with the Churches leader. 

She also states " "It is a Medieval bullying stick the bishops used to keep control over people and to keep the voices of women silent. I am way beyond letting octogenarian men tell us how to live our lives." Well one could argue that some bishops and Popes of the past were sacrilegious of the Catholic Faith. That they were plagued by heresy, and schism, but if this is a act of the Church as a whole, then the Churches teaching is infallible. This is not to draw the line, or install a glass ceiling on women's rights in the Church. I am no person to declare the will of God, but I am a firm member of the Catholic Church, and wish to stay in Communion with Christ and his body, therefore believe and follow the Church's teachings, and I believe what the Pope taught and will teach will be correct. 

Also, she speaks that the Church is a body of State. AS A CATHOLIC WE ARE NO COUNTRY! We come from many Nationalities, and wish to unify the world as one people, one body, one God. We seek for equal representation of all human life, and coming from a males perspective, not to put down and silence our other half. 

Finally, if she was a Catholic, and wishes to hold the same standards as a Catholic, but wishes to incorporate women in the sacred sacrament, She gains nothing by splintering the Church. You solve no problems by starting fires. She fails just as greatly as Martin Luther did in the 14 Century. She might spark insight, but by forming a new religion, she only allows further splintering from her religion.

I believe see this more as a cry for attention, then as a act of faith. 

To the 6th Graders of America--on Anoiting

Anointing has been a part of the Catholic Tradition since the time the bible was written. The formation of the sacrament drew heavily from the Christ's healing and anointing of the sick in James 5:14-16:

           “Is anyone among you sick? He should summon the presbyters of the church, 

and they should pray over him and anoint (him) with oil in the name of the 

Lord, the prayer of faith will save the sick person, and the Lord will raise him 

up. If he has committed any sins, he will be forgiven.”

In the 3rd Century, Apostolic Tradition, by Hipppolytus described in his writings the anointing of the sick. In 5th century A.D. Pope Innocent addressed anointing explicitly in his letter to Decentius, Bishop of Gubbio. The letter was a reaction to a interpretation held by only presbyters could administer the sacrament and not bishops. This was corrected in Congregation for the Doctrine of the 

Faith.

In the 15th century, major leeps were made in the Council of Florence: to use olive oil blessed by a priest, only given to the sick if death is expected, person is anointed on eyes, ears, nostrils, mouth, hands, feet and loins,the minister of the sacrament is a priest and the effect is to cure the mind, body, and soul.

confession

All of us have misconceptions to what confession is, what it does, and the proper way to celebrate the Sacrament. Today in this article all of your questions will be answered. Some people that when we become Christians all sins past present and future are forgive. This is not true, nowhere in scripture does it state that our future sins are forgiven. Some people believe confession is necessary for every little sin, but this is also not the case, small menial sins can be confessed straight to God himself but bigger mortal sins must be confessed to a priest during the Sacrament of Confession in order for them to be forgiven. Since we know we cannot confess all of our little daily sins we know confessions is for grave mortal sins. Back during the time of Christ people did their penance before absolution today the order is reversed. Over the years confession has changed some, but the roots of the Sacrament stayed the same. The Didache says "Confess your sins in church, and do not go up to your prayer with an evil conscience. This is the way of life. . . . On the Lord’s Day gather together, break bread, and give thanks, after confessing your transgressions so that your sacrifice may be pure". I hope this article on Confession helps enhance the knowledge of the Sacrament and clear up all misconceptions.

Miracle of Lanciano

This Miracle takes place during the 700 A.D., in the city of Lanciano.

In St. Longinus Church a Basilian monk said Mass with doubt of the true presence of Christ in his soul. Upon saying the words of Consecration the bread and wine turned into true living flesh. The blood coagulated into 5 pools, varying in size and shape. 

This is a picture of the literal flesh and blood the was consecrated into the body and Blood of Christ. It is responsible of a strange phenomenon baffling scientist. Five blood "pellets" were resulted from the miracle, each varying in size and shape, but when weighed the all weigh the same, and when added to each other and weighed against, no matter how many pellets are weighed, they equal the same weight. 

The most recent scientific research done on the material was in 1970 and was proved that...

• The flesh is real flesh. The blood is real blood.
• The flesh consists of the muscular tissue of the heart  (myocardium)
• The flesh and blood belong to the human species.
• The flesh and blood have the same blood type (AB).
• In the blood, there were found proteins in the same normal proportions as are found in the sero-proteic make up of fresh, normal blood.
• In the blood, there were also found these minerals: Chlorides, phosphorous, magnesium, potassium, sodium and calcium. The preservation of the flesh and of the blood, which were
  left in their natural state for twelve centuries (without any chemical preservatives) and exposed to the action of atmospheric and biological agents, remains an extraordinary phenomenon.

Christ day after day gives us his flesh and blood in accordance for our sins. He gives it to us freely, to accept or reject freely, and without hesitation. He simply asks for us to believe fully in him, and to conform ourselves to the incarnation. Celebrating Christ with doubt in our soul is much like entrusting your life to a serial killer. Foolish, and suicide. We should fully believe in Christ and his Church, and fully entrust our souls and will to them. 

Eucharist

Hey guys. Today I’m going to talk about who can really receive the Eucharist. People who can receive the Eucharist are as follows: Catholics, other christians, and some exceptions. Next I’m going to talk about some exceptions, and then go into deeper why some can receive the eucharist and some cannot. Some exceptions, of those who can receive the eucharist are Protestants and Eastern Orthodox churches. The reasons why protestants can receive the eucharist are more limited than others. Protestants can only receive the Eucharist when the presence of death is eminent and they truly wish to repent and accept Jesus. eastern Orthodox has almost the same limitations but can also receive it in the acceptance of penance.

We as catholics can receive the Eucharist in many different areas. We can receive it before death in the anointing of the sick. We can receive it during penance. And we most often receive it during mass. There are some restrictions how we can receive it. We cannot receive it with a mortal sin on our conscience and cannot receive it without fasting for an hour before. Thanks guys bye.  

Who Can Receive Communion?

Gentlemen, Today I will be speaking to you about who can receive communion. Communion is the most important of the seven sacraments instituted by Christ. The Church has specific guidelines for those who can receive communion. First you must be in a state of grace. Therefore you must not have a mortal sin on you conscience, if you receive  communion with a   mortal sin it is another mortal sin. Another major requirement is that the person receiving the sacrament must believe in transubstantiation. Those receiving must observe the Eucharistic fast.  Finally those receiving cannot be under ecclesiastical censure. Catholics welcome other Christians to join them in the sacrament of Eucharist. Although Catholics encourage non Christians to join them in the celebrating of the liturgy but not in the Sacrament of Eucharist. I hope what I have told you today helps you understand who can and cannot receive the Sacrament of Communion.